Agreed. Isn’t this just the definition of abare?
Agreed again.
The bolded bit is what’s causing the confusion here, darknid. I don’t really blame Vulcan Hades for extrapolating arguments when you were so unclear.
The knowledgeable players you cite here are “wise to” the threat of reversals from - frames --> ??? --> You’re left with nothing more than frame disadvantage (PROFIT!)
What are these knowledgeable players doing to invalidate the threat of reversals from frame disadvantage? Are they poking? No, because they’d eat a reversal. Are they jumping, throwing? No, because they’d eat a reversal. Backdashing? Maybe, but then they’d lose their frame advantage.
What everyone probably thought you meant is that they are blocking, because that’s what you do against a threat of a frame advantage reversal. And if they’re blocking, then Hades was right in his assessment that by not exploiting their frame advantage for fear of the opponent’s reversal, they are giving up that frame advantage.
What option are you thinking of that both invalidates the possibility of reversals from - frames and retains your frame advantage?
Hades, I think this is what upset Darknid so much, in the sense that here you seem to be saying that being in negative frames is legit good, whereas below you clarify that obviously being at frame advantage is better than being at disadvantage, because you have more options, and better options, but being at frame disadvantage presents a few unique options and baits that you can exploit. Which, like you said, there shouldn’t really be much argument over.
We need to learn how to play at frame disadvantage just as much as we need to know how to exploit frame advantage.
Edit: BTW if my previous post on this sounds much more negative about the possibility of playing effectively from frame disadvantage, that’s because I hadn’t fully thought it through until you discussed it further, Hades