I deleted that last post because I felt as if I was being lazy, so here’s a proper more in depth view on my choices between the three. I’ll first start with Nestle and post the two others at a later date. To note I’ll only review and evaluate the ones I have personal experience with.
Nestle
Nestle Crunch:
The standard poster bar of the brand. It is a basic milk chocolate bar, but with crisp rice mixed into it. The Crunch letters on the bar is a nice touch and makes it fun to eat. Taste wise it is sweet, crunchy, but doesn’t have too much of an addicting euphoria to insight you to buy more. 7/10
Nestle Crunch White:
Just like the standard bar, but made out of cocoa butter and not the standard cocoa beans that most chocolate bars are made out of. The taste is pleasant, but gives even a less desire for more than Nestle Crunch 6/10
Nestle Crunch Mocha :
Like the other two, but coffee is added in the chocolate. I’m not too fond of these types of bars at all so take it with a grain of salt. 3/10
100 Grand:
It is similar to the Nestle Crunch as it is milk chocolate with crisp rice, but is separated into two pieces and it also has caramel. I believe it is an acquired taste though as I don’t know that many that prefer it. I think highly of it though. Its flaws are that it could be slightly tough to bite into and sometimes pieces can stick to the roof of your mouth. I think the combination is delicious and appeases most of its flaws. 7.5/10
Kit Kat:
Kit Kat as I see it isn’t really a candy bar. Being a wafer I only see it as that, but just covered in chocolate. Kit Kats have a lot less sweeter taste compared to the others. I can see the appeal of it and I like them myself, but I hardly ever finding myself going back for more. 5/10.
Butterfinger:
Butterfingers are made out of some caramel/peanut butter compound covered with chocolate. This is an odd bar. The bar’s taste is somewhat pleasing, but hardness of the bar is unpleasant to me and not worth it for the taste. The Simpsons commercials for it were funny. 4/10
Butterfinger BBs:
Same as butterfingers but in miniaturized ball form. Due to size they are slightly softer than the standard bar, but it is not enough to get my attention. The Simpson commercials for it and the original were pretty funny back in the day. 4.5/10
Nestle Crunchers:
A miniaturized ball form of Nestle Crunch. The taste here is a definite decrease compared to the original. It has an odd semi-sweet taste compared to the original. It has nothing going for it besides its size. 3/10
Wonka bar:
The wonka bar I really like. It’s a graham cracker covered in milk chocolate. The combination is one I never expected and the result is fantastic! The bland, but slight honey taste of a graham cracker goes well with the sweetness of milk chocolate. The wrapper is also pleasant as well. The purple packaging with the gold foil compliments one another and stands out among others.
9/10
As for non chocolate bars Nestle also has cookies, cereal, and milk going for it. The cereal I have never tasted, but Their chocolate in the Toll House cookies I really like. It tastes richer and sweeter. It may be the dough helps it a lot more compared to Hershey’s chocolate in Pillsbury cookies, but I like it better overall. 8/10
Nesquick I wasn’t really a fan of. Something about it tastes too bland, sugary, and fake.
4/10.
Overall 5/10. Nestle doesn’t have much going for it. It has the excellent Wonka bar and a couple of okays, but too many bad products which leaves it in a poor position.
Next up is Hershey’s.