Nah, none of my monitors go below 800X600 i have the option to try 120hz but when i select it the screen blacks-outs then reverts back to 60hz. I’ll just buy a new monito when i get the cash.
Yes they do. Windows XP is just a pansy about putting a minimum limit on a desktop resolution which is where your judgment is formed from.
If a monitor from the past two decades can’t do 640x480, then it shouldn’t have been manufactured.
Zip7
223
Was Borderlands mentioned at all?
Unreal Tournament 2002 (never tried 2004 but I’d probably enjoy it)
TF2 (best team-based FPS strategy game ever)
Quake 2
Doom2
L4D2 (lots of 2’s here I’m noticing)
COD is ass
You know whats strange? if you watch some recent quake live and starcraft tournaments people still use old CRT’s, I’ve always wondered why, then I stumbled across these video comparisons after you mentioned CRT’s, (forward the first vid to 3:10):
[media=youtube]hBSf24-N17A[/media]
[media=youtube]ZAHoKJZn3-k[/media]
CRT’s are 3% faster than LCD’s even when both are set at 120hz. LCD’s today still arent on par with the old CRT’s when it comes to response time which is a damn shame. On the other hand I can buy a good quality CRT for £1-10 max.
Single Player
- Duke Nukem 3D
- Serious Sam (Both Parts)
- Wolfenstein (Original)
- Doom (Original)
- Halo : Combat Evolved
All the multiplayer games are too similar and too new to rank in my opinion.
HeaT
227
it really seems negligible, and your body and reflexes naturally adjust to whats being displayed. there are top players who play on lcds and have no issues. i remember in ut2k4, one of the best players actually used mouse accel, like it was always on, he said he just got used to it so he never switched. that’s just crazy to me but i guess if you are good you are going to be good no matter what. another weird thing is i remember some guy mapping left and right movement to A and S and up and down to R and F. he used his pinky for all lateral movement, he wasnt very good though.
im outi
Roberth
