Hell yes. If I actually get one at least I’ll take pride in the fact that she won’t be a hambeast when she gets old unlike thick girls that just fall the fuck off after a certain age.
I know a girl that has big tits and ass but the only way I’d hit it is when I get some tequila in me. I prefer a girl that isn’t super skinny but doesn’t have thunder thighs/ cankles/ fupa a lot of guys like cottage cheese legs and overall “thick” women. But the only wave I’d ride is the ocean.
Basically what Soviet said. Every sort of body can have it’s appeal and it’s downside. I like thick girls, but I’m not falling for that one. She’ll look good for about two weeks after the honeymoon and then PFFFHHHHHHHHHHHSHHHH! She explodes everywhere. Skinny girls can be downright ugly, but there are some skinny girls who are proportioned properly to give dat hadron.
It’s really simple: When skinny girl has a cute face, big ass and tiny tits = :tup: Skinny girl with cute face, big tits and no ass = :tdown: Legs is a given, since they usually come packaged as an accessory to a plush ass that won’t cellulose sag in 5 - 10 years. :tup:
Just to clarify, thick is not a euphemism for chubby/ fat. Thick girls may have a bit extra in the thighs/ middle, but they have big, nice asses, and are stacked. Otherwise, they are just a bit heavy. Or bigger.
Either way, I prefer women that are athletically toned. There’s a huge difference between girls that are skinny because they work out and girls that are skinny because they are just anorexic bitches that don’t eat. The pic in the OP is the latter category.