WWIII will involve a holy war against Islam.
No, against your arse.
the first sequel kinda killed the WW series imo. fuckin hollywood and their sequels. i wont check it out
They are bringing in Michael Bay for this one…there will be explosions everywhere, no one will know what’s really going on, and there will be ton of Kim Jon Un and dick jokes to be had…
-:bluu:
And instead of actual people, the soldiers will all be artificial creations by nerdy engineers.
This is true, especially when you take into account of the Zionist that want to murder everyone with WWIII. Zionist controlled America started this holy war. I still can’t believe that dumbasses here believe that the TV never lies.
I’m going to laugh so hard at the naysayers when WWIII happens. I bet some tool is going to quote me with a “conspiracy theorist are stupid” meme.
I really don’t understand your point at all. A global economy that is built on the idea of continual expansion and dwindling resources is a world problem.
The engine that keeps pushing us towards an inevitable collapse is best seen in the prisoner’s dilemma:
http://www.econlib.org/library/Enc/PrisonersDilemma.html
The classic example of this is 2 prisoners who are asked to confess or remain silent. But really this is about being stuck between taking a competitive choice and a cooperative choice.
Another way to imagine this would be a vast communal field in which numerous farmers tended their flocks. If a farmer has a big flock, his profits will go up. But if all the farmers have a big flock the field will run out of grass and everyone will suffer. But if a farmer shrinks their flock they risk another farmer growing their theirs to take advantage of the opening in the field.
Cooperating is a risk, as it offers your competitor a chance to take advantage of you. But if no one cooperates everyone will eventually lose. It’s pretty easy to see how this applies to limited resources and the global economy. No one wants to cut their production, but we all can’t keep consuming resources at this rate.
This produces a stalemate where all parties continue to grow until the proverbial field has reached its capacity. And then what happens? The current global economy demands continual growth and you have no where left to grow that isn’t controlled by someone else. The only way to sustain your economic system is to grow at the expense of someone else…and no one is going to just give away their part of the field.
This gets back to the point I made about how far will governments be willing to go to maintain their status quo.
TLDR: the current status quo is unsustainable, yet currently profitable to those in power. When the status quo is no longer sustainable, those in power are likely to take incredibly hostile actions to maintain it as long as possible.
Gotta get them all…