An angry man?
Its obvious you’re trolling, so no need to respond to the likes of you. Holla at me when you get ya smarts up homie
U mad?
Nope 
I feel great!!
U seem mad, you should calm down brah, the big bad internet wont hurt you
Why haven’t you quoted me? From all the posters that gave you attention, you have not responded towards me. You are new. Use the search and search about me.
Anyways, your point of view is seriously wrong. Seriously bro. Your whole negative views do not make any point about morals, humanity, or values being meaningless what you are actually showing is that your point of view is based because your life is actually meaningless (at the moment). meaning, it sucks. Your thoughts are what you are… Look at you trying to impress yourself from being logical. Start reading Philosophies and enjoy life.
Life isn’t about survival of the fittest but bringing good in your life and living a good life.
You can be the biggest, strongest, richest, and bad ass dude on the planet but that actually becomes “meaningless” in the end (death). It’s how you live your life and the good you brought out from it that matters, because your life will still have meaning even after you die.
Search on my great posts, btw.
Finally, something I can work with. Again your whole reply begs the question; What is this transcendent element that decides what’s a negative or positive view?What is this transcendent element that decides what is a good or bad life? And I actually do enjoy life, it may be in a different way than other might go by enjoying it, but I do enjoy it. Also this talk about your life still having meaning when you die makes no sense. When you’re dead you no longer have life. You’re life ultimately no longer exists after death. And also Iike you said, many people in an attempt to be happy try and give meaning to their **ultimately **meaningless life. I do the same, but at the same time I wont ignore that in the reality of things, **ultimately **life is meaningless.
Oh wow, look, another person with psychic powers around here. I must be on a psychics-only forum; my bad. =P
Question time: Why did it have to be a knife? Why couldn’t he have used one of many non-lethal methods to get away or fight back? More importantly, if he knew this attack was coming, why did he choose to face it alone?
Even more worrying: Why did he have to stab *twelve times? *That seems excessive to me, like what somebody would do when they want to make sure the other person is dead. x__x
The only thing that I might have done differently would have been to get the kid some psychological help. Other than that, it’s really hard to judge a kid the same as one would an adult. =/
I only wish that this could have ended differently, without the need for brutal bloodshed.
http://www.naplesnews.com/news/2012/jan/07/jorge-saavedra-dylan-nuno-collier-bus-stop-stabbed/
What the fuck does any of this have to do with the fact that if you’re bullying anyone, anywhere, at any time, you’re a fucking asshole and nothing more. If you have no compassion for other people, if you feel no remorse for making another human being feel like shit you’re probably a psychopath. Unfortunately for your crazy ass “survival of the fittest” doesn’t exactly apply to today’s world. People have come a looooong way on this earth and they’ve done it through helping each other.
A bully has never accomplished shit by bullying outside of high school. Hell I wasn’t a real cool guy in high school, I had real strict parents so while I was at home all my friends were out partying. That took me outta the loop, but even I teased and pushed around the even LESS cool people, and I got laughs. Looking back I was an asshole. I used I follow a group of dorks to the park on lunch every day with some friends and toss rocks at them. Were they wimpy little pussies who cried about it and cut themselves? No. Do I still feel like that was some stupid shit to do? Yes. Some of us never grew the fuck up though. This “dominate by bullying” mentality has no place in the adult world.
The transcendent element is what separates us from Animals, morality. Additionally, point of views like yours are actually Psychologist-check up worthy because it lacks wisdom and shows that the person has a low point of direction in his/her life. Your point of view is apathetic which is why i have this feeling that these thoughts of yours are from your own “universe” (mind).
What gives us the decision on what a negative or positive view is how it effects us and others (physically or emotionally). If it effects us/others negatively then it is obviously a negative. It’s obviously wrong and we can feel it.
As for the part in your post that i bolded and underlined, i did that because you actually missed my post because i’ve explained it. Life is defined on the positives we do and leaving a meaning of our lives so that it may echo ones we are gone. If people were to live life completely meaningless then life itself would not progress or evolve. Most of the things in our lives in this generation -from philosophy, sciences, knowledge, technology, and our own personal memories- came from people who lived before us. It’s not about survival of the fittest but assuring that the meaning of our own lives remain even after we die.
Okay lemme show you the hypocrisy of your little rant.
If those of the past were to somehow come into our present modern American nation and see our thoughts and our relatively high abortion rates, they’d consider us heartless murderers. So you somehow are the standard of decent morality? Oh I didnt know that the great Lunaid was worthy enough to subject myself unto his morals. Oh PRAISE LUNAID PRAIISSE!!! Do you fancy yourself a god? So you are the one who decides the evil and good? So you are the standard of morality? So you are the one who decides what our purposes are? I’m a psychopath huh? Hahaha yea you’re worthy enough to have me subject to your ways huh? lmaoo
You’re all kinds of stupid. You sound like one of those crazies you see on TV shows about serial killers. I live in a society, I was raised a certain way, and I have adopted my own way of thinking and feeling. When I see something suffering, I feel compassion for it. This is how we’ve developed as people. I’m not alone in this, I’m not the one deciding this. You don’t sound intelligent, you don’t sound cool. You sound like an angry little man who wants to be all dark and edgy.
SImiliarly to my response to Lunaid, I now must ask, who are you to decide my ways or “morals” are psychotic? Are you the standard for human decency? Is your wisdom the standard for wisdom? If I killed Hitler during his reign in Nazi Germany, the Nazi’s would call me evil, the Jews would call me good and a hero. Who’s standard is right? None. If the origin of all being came from mere purposeless chance, then ultimately purpose in life is nonexistent.
Again you must ask yourself, do you fancy yourself a god? Cause that’s exactly what you’re acting like. You decide who’s a psychopath and who’s not based on morality that ultimately spurned from chance, thats the irony of it all.
Dude, you are arguing just for the hell of it. I’m not deciding your ways of morals i certainly have no idea why you came up with this response.
Next, if you killed Hitler then your standards is right because look at the amount of lives he destroyed because of how he viewed life. He viewed life as only meant for the strong and the strong was in racial point of view that eventually evolved into hate. To historians, Hitlers political reasons were actually legit in a pro-german sense but his thoughts later evolved into something sadistic and inhumane which eliminated any sort of right in his politics.
Last, i’m not fancing myself as a god. Just because i am giving you actual philosophies and telling that your point of view is wrong doesn’t mean I’m acting like a god. It’s regular human standards. Even if there are some people who will think that they have the right to do certain actions doesn’t mean that it is right at all.
As i said bro, your point of view is Psychologist worthy because it is messed up, you are not making any sort of sense at all but forcing your points to make sense. In other words you are just being a self-rationalist. The way you look at life is based on how you are living (your mind). You think life is meaningless and have all this “Wrongs and Rights…blahblah” because this is what you feel in your life. It’s noticable in your attitude too because you have been arguing so strongly about this in two topics and you actually insist to fight anyone who tries to respond with a contradiction towards you. Get a check up bro.
You do realize you’re misinterpreting the term “survival of the fittest”, right? Which is also a terminology theorized by man. So if you want to live by this idea, then it is your philosophy, but you can’t, because philosophies are “artificial”. If you really want to look at animals to see what life is all about, it’s about reproduction.
Slightly OT, but related. Some kid got jumped by 7 dudes here.
[media=youtube]5HZQ7l2xYqA[/media]]
This was posted in another thread. But yeah, this shit gotta stop.
You are not getting it. You just are not getting it. How in the hell are you saying what you’re saying? The origin of absolutely EVERYTHING in existence is mere chance. You keep saying that I’m wrong , but by who’s standards? Cuz last time I checked Chance does not hold a transcendent moral law for us to follow, we are just here by being here thats it.
Lemme give an example. Many religious people hold to moral convictions that say that sex before marriage is bad. Those that are very religious and do commit that act, fall into a depression and make themselves guilty. They felt they were wrong so were they? I guess they were by your words. Our moral standards change generation after generation. Morality is like money. In itself it had no real value, unless attached to something higher. Chance gives no value to our morality, so all it is is meaningless constructs of human mind. Also its funny that you bring up philosophy because you know that some of our current day philosophers look to old philosophers who in their day were considered “psychotic” for their at the time extreme thoughts.
You seem to be unfit to post on these forums, perhaps a mod should teach you Darwin via a ban?