Your position on the matter is fine. It’s just that GI is a terrible example because they are terrible reviewers :lol:.
Anyway, trying the game out yourself is always the best solution. That’s easily agreeable.
Your position on the matter is fine. It’s just that GI is a terrible example because they are terrible reviewers :lol:.
Anyway, trying the game out yourself is always the best solution. That’s easily agreeable.
[media=youtube]1oTBlA9hEX4[/media]
god…
What did they say about BB’s graphics? Anybody know?
I’m just waiting for Richard Li’s review on 1up. At least he knows his stuff. I’ve already pre-ordered my copy but I’m waiting for this one to convince the most people I can to this game.
omg he can’t be serious.
lol. :wtf:
every thread about fighting game reviews needs this
[media=youtube]8ahn6SZSeaE[/media]
that said, i was more than a little surprised over the big score from IGN
also xplay’s review is gonna be on their next episode, which should be on monday
Wow. An old G4 show. I think I enjoyed G4 more back in the day.
Well, IGN’s review was from an enthusiast anyways. Most reviews are more like guidelines anyways. People all have different tastes when it comes to which game they like.
omg!!
I think Gaming In The Clinton Years had some of the best mainstream reviews for fighting games in general:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3588854476570186256
a high school girl on a mission
“For those of you who saw the Street Fighter movie, you now that Guile’s friend, Charlie, turns into Blanka via Bison’s genetic experiments.”
The moment I heard him say that I :lol:'d and closed the tab.
Well played, sir. Well played indeed.
For everyone concerned over G.I. scores (and other so-called ‘professional’ reviewers), please read this:
http://www.jivemagazine.com/column.php?pid=2589
or if you’re too lazy:
And don’t forget it.
If anything in my eyes, it hurts their image more, as far as I can know, a review is one’s personal opinion regarding things. One should tell how THEY feel about the game and why, and if bias’, state there might be, so people can take it into account. As long as opinions are rightfully supported, there’s no reason it can be one’s actual opinion.
sigh in before 8.8 and all the other crap some pro reviewers get for expressing their opinion. Crazy :looney:
So journalists are supposed to be psychic now and guess what the public will think of the game? Charming. Gamestop should have backed EGM instead of this trash rag. They deserved the coin.
Eh. It would’ve very likely meant that EGM would’ve succumbed to this instead.
Think about it. Gamestop wants to sell every game on their shelves, especially ones they ordered hundreds of. So a magazine that was truly objectively critical wouldn’t be in their best interest. Yeah, they don’t give 9’s to everything. But they’ll never trash or even give really mediocre reviews to something that’s expected to sell millions.
But I hope no one really believes EGM is/was perfect. Yes, better than G.I., but pretty much everything (except for Play Magazine) is.
So, after doing some reading I was prepared to decide what I wanted to say on the subject; likely something about different strokes for different folks regarding the G.I. review, but then I saw:
and I pretty much lost track of what I wanted to say. A difference of opinion regarding a review is not uncommon, but the real problem with this is inconsistency. You can’t have a reviewer call Mortal Kombat “the consummate fighter” and then turn around and ha–wait…you just can’t have someone call Mortal Kombat the consummate fighter, period.
I did the exact same thing!
*)PSX-Extreme 9.0
http://www.psxextreme.com/ps3-reviews/255.html
*)GamePro 9.0
*)Official Playstation Magazine 9.0
Questions??
Good reviews across the board. I should get mines from gamestop after work, then I can see for myself.
I’m waiting on the game as we speak. Nice to know the reviews are good though.