This site has compiled a list of facts on the suspected perpetrators.
This part stands out.
One of em dropped their passport and was packing that kinda heat. Sounds like these guys wanted to be mercenaries or some crazy shit, hopefully the fuckers will get caught soon.
I like how crucades is not mentioning the Armenian genocide of Turks. The Turks have the proof and scholars from everywhere, even the us have researched it. The point is both parties are guilty, the Armenians killed the Turkish soldiers women, children and parents when they were at war at the western front. When they returned and found the carnage they went in 1 straight line through Armenia and killed everything in their path. Eye for an eye.
Problem with the Armenian situation is that the Armenians just want a financial retribution, and are not interested in any kind of investigation into the matter. The reason is very simple, it’s because they started it and are just as guilty, if not more. The Turks might have killed more, but the Armenians were barbaric themselves. The fact that you wait for the men to leave and attack women, children and elderly says more than enough about what they are really like. The fact that they don’t want any kind of investigation in the matter says it all really (women with titties cut of and shit, babies thrown into fires etc).
If only these French pussies and the rest of these fucks had the same respect for the lives of others and actually protested against the wars, I might have had some respect for them. Freedm of speech is good and all, but if you purposely go lookin for trouble and get it then that’s a possibility of what could happen. What did the little kids I. Countries likeiraq, Syria Libya etc ever do to anybody? Why is it OK for them to get killed? Because you can gain oil from it? Would it have been ok if these reporters were robbed and killed instead? The reasoning by a lot of these sick little fucks doesn’t make any sense.
I never mentioned it because it was irrelevant to the topic at hand, tataki asked for a country where muslims chill and i gave him one and then gave reasons why its not a secular society. I could give zero fucks about the turks or armenians. Lastly I know your trolling with that last paragraph but really? France are the masters of protest, hell dont the yankees hate em cause they never bought into that bullshit war on terror in the first place?
He is a cracker-ass scrub who loves sucking on banker dick. Sorry son, but you aren’t getting on that Blackrock Investment Group LLC life anytime soon.
Do the Paris cops not have guns?
That dude was completely helpless, looked like he got tagged running away and had to resort to begging for his life. That is horrible.
Is this the cause of the proliferation of the no-go zones in France (impotent police), or is it just a sense of they want to be tolerant to Islam. Also I dont think I have ever seen a more lackadaisical getaway.
The West is so disconnected from the mindset of the truly religious, it’s laughable. The dialogue and discourse about this subject is just further proof of how blind the West as a whole is to the mindset of the Muslim community and people. Imagine someone is walking down the street and another person walks up to them and spits in their face. That is the equivalent, to Muslims, of what this publication was doing. So, if that person reacts violently, perhaps even murderously, you may condemn them for going too far or being too violent, but you will at least, on some level, understand the action they took, and place part of the blame on the person who initiated the confrontation. That is why many Muslims, while they do not approve of the attack, will understand and sympathize with it at least somewhat.
Westerners are incapable of understanding this, because to them, what this publication did is merely satire. The West is such a secular society that they do not understand what a sacred thing really is any longer, and what that really means. To the Muslims this wasn’t satire, it was sacrilege. What you’re seeing here is what you can see across Western societies in a variety of ways, which is the attempt to meld incompatible cultures and values, while retaining their unique nature. This is impossible, on a fundamental level, and so what has resulted is essential mini societies within society itself. That is why you have multiple Shariah law courts operating within countries like England, because the people using them do not view the secular law of the land as true law.
The fact is that either the West or the Muslims will have to adapt, and alter the way their societies function to attain a real merger as a people and as a society. Either the Islamists must abandon their religious standpoint and cultural traditions, to at least some extent, or the West will have to adapt to them, and change the way it operates, including on the level of free speech and many other areas. Otherwise, this kind of thing is going to continue, as two entirely different viewpoints and value systems constantly butt heads with each other.
Fun fact the same proportion of muslims in the UK want Sharia Law as white British folk want severely increased punishment for crime. Also in England Sharia Law operate within the framework of existing English/Welsh law. Tataki I thought you were Scandavian man aint you guys meant to be chill? Pew reports lol, dem dudes are the gawker of the political world.
It’s not accepted within mainstream Judaism but that is exactly the type of change I was talking about.
Edit: Notice how the type of Judaism that practices this has an actual name to differentiate it from the rest. What’s the name of the “religion of peace” type of Islam?
Here’s a full list so someone more knowledgeable can point me to the “real Islam”:
I really like this post. QFT, mostly. The last point, though, about having either side adapt - why can’t it be both? Compromise is a two-way street. Unhappy/insulted Muslims should realize that peaceful protest is a very powerful option instead of looking to violence whether it be with AK-47s or stones.
The fact that the western countries that they live in will not limit freedom of speech. It is a right to assemble and state your grievances against anyone who has offended you. Drawing Muhammad is offensive and uncomfortable for the followers of Islam. Then why would anyone do it then? To push the envelope of freedom of speech and to show the world the types of things possible in a truly free country. Do Muslims think that if this offense is allowed then it will be a regular occurrence or think that the Western world wants to constantly offend one of the most largely followed religions in the world? The western and eastern world will never integrate if it has to compromise its freedom of speech to do so. Why would the Muslim community want to move anywhere in the Western world if they see us as having all of the vices of the modern world? Why advocate our destruction instead of for our separation? It just makes no sense to me.