No details worth a fuck given yet.
Shootings happen- though they’re actually down significantly since 93- the press just doubles down on reporting when it’s agenda pushing time.
Why this statistic isn’t brought up more often is beyond me. Wait I know why…
Last time it was used on Real Time on Bill Maher and it really fucked up Michael Moore.
“Get a dog.”
actually I gave you the single most important argument for weapon ownership and that was whether or not a people should allow a state to own the monopoly on violence.
You just regurgitated what I said, you said. You just appealed to emotion, and quoting the value of life lost as the primary argument for the banning of weapons. That is your only argument, and anybody counters, you repeat the same tired bullshit, why do you need.
Do you even read?
I bet you handguns where the primary weapon again.
And I bet you the restrictions will be against “military style” weapons.
The people of this country are a fucking joke.
Yes and cars apparently are very efficient killing machines too. They may be nice forms of transportation, but in reality they can do more damage than a gun ever could.
But you hit exactly why no one wants to regulate them even though there are multiple positive effects like reducing carbon emissions, saving lives, etc. because it would be inconvenient. That and most people don’t want to find out they are terrible drivers.
lol i remember that. S.E. Cupp destroyed that poor man
EDIT:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MehDUmPq1Qo
you need a gun to defend yourself and your loved ones. picture a world with no great equalizers whatsoever and Overeem broke into your house to bang your girl.
http://i.imgur.com/TAj0EQW.jpg
glass chin aside, you ain’t stoppin’ that sexy man. this can, though:
http://i.imgur.com/Ya1wtq3.jpg
EDIT:
found this:
http://i.imgur.com/oLD8pZc.jpg
also this:
Spoiler
waiting for that to be ignored
Some good ole cherry picking bullshit going on in here I see lol.
I love me some cherry picking.
Please call it out crucades. You possess anything to dispute it?
crickets
Correction- bagpipes.
You are ridiculous…you need to backtrack and see the replies.
My initial post was asking for valid reasons in which guns could be used beneficially that outweigh the overwhelmingly negative effect of them. In that same post, I disregarded the idea of monopoly on violence because of how ridiculous it is - this is the paranoid, fear mongering conspiracy theorists reason for having guns and there is no legitimate justification for it.
You responded to the post by countering the explosives comment I made but didn’t address anything else…now you’re saying you brought up monopoly on violence, which I don’t see brought up in your initial response but it doesn’t matter because it’s just a ridiculous argument.
Oh, don’t mind me. I’m just watching Shaft Agent silently caress all of your exposed spleens.
:tup:
Shooter was asking people their religion before he shot them. Maybe THAT is what we should be restricting…
Unwise. Cracking down on religion just makes zealous action in the defense of it look ‘justified’ instead of being terrorism.
I don’t think we should be ‘cracking down’ on religions, but keeping an eye on religious people seems to make more and more sense these days.
I now know how immensely retarded you are now thanks to this post. Thank you.
That much is true, though the distinction between those two concepts is one that’s lost on most of our species and almost always has been. …They’re getting better about it, though, slowly yet surely.